Jump directly to the Content
Jump directly to the content
Article

Rachel Marie Stone


Not Real Simple

The appeal of Amish romance novels.

The winter of 2010 was my fourth consecutive winter living overseas. After three years in Scotland, we were in north-central Germany, where the weather had been particularly cold and snowy, and where most of my outings seemed to involve either the university hospital emergency room or the pediatrician's office.

When my in-laws sent me a Kindle for Christmas—so that I might have access to Englische Bucher—I was eager for some very, very light reading: reading that would allow me to "escape" and, I hoped, help me feel less lonely and homesick. Many of the top free Kindle books were romances from evangelical publishing houses, and as we were living on a postdoctoral stipend, these fit the bill in more ways than one. I noted that the free books were usually the first installments in this or that series: clearly the hope was that after reading one I'd be so hooked that I'd buy the rest. Instead I read just the first books in a number of series—Love Comes Softly, the grandmother of contemporary inspirational romance, published several years before I was born; A Gift of Grace, which introduced Amy Clipston's Kauffman Amish Bakery series; and The Shunning, volume 1 in Beverly Lewis' Heritage of Lancaster County series—to whose success the dozens and hundreds of Amish-themed romance novels now available owe, at least in part, their very existence. Wrapped in layers of wool, I clicked through these novels eagerly on my Kindle, suspending my disbelief and my graduate school-inflected literary judgments and allowing the stories to transport me to a place that felt like a bit closer to home.

Two years later, back in my home state of New York, I downloaded another free Amish-themed novel onto my Kindle, but, this time, I couldn't get into it. The characters seemed flat, the plots, improbable. The back wall of the wardrobe was once again in place, and I didn't need that particular portal any longer. Meanwhile, and partly thanks to e-readers like my Kindle, Amish-themed fiction has exploded. It has become its own category, with spiraling subcategories that include, improbably, Amish vampire novels and LGBT-themed Amish romances. A new Amish themed novel appears about every four days, and some writers churn out a new novel every three to four months. The slow-and-simple appeal of the Amish is swift and lucrative publishing business. Is all of this hopelessly contradictory and frivolous consumption, or is the appeal of Amish novels more complex?

In The Thrill of the Chaste, her study of the appeal of Amish romance novels, Valerie Weaver-Zercher takes a blended scholarly and journalistic approach that foregrounds her personal connection to Plain people. As a Mennonite raised in Lancaster County who has Amish ancestry and Amish second cousins in Ohio, Weaver-Zercher wryly notes that her background is perfect for a writer of Amish novels—Amish or Mennonite ancestry, however distant, can be an important selling point for novelists eager to break into the market, and first-hand knowledge of Amish people and their ways (having actually eaten "those smooth, mashed-by-hand potatoes," for instance) is helpful in lending a feel of authenticity to the books. Weaver-Zercher is not about to cash in on her Plain roots, and she admits to ambivalence about the genre, but her background certainly inflects the deeply empathetic approach of this study. She looks at the novels themselves, at the workings of the publishing industry that gives rise to them, at cultural theory, and, significantly, listens to the voices of the genre's dedicated readers. Following upon Janice Radway's widely influential study of romance novels and their readers, Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Culture and reminiscent of Amy Frykholm's Rapture Culture: Left Behind in Evangelical America, a study of the readers of the popular Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins books, Weaver-Zercher takes the voices of readers themselves seriously in her analysis of what makes "bonnet books" so popular, among evangelicals in particular.

Ignorance of evangelical "tribal discourse," Weaver-Zercher argues, makes it difficult for outsiders to understand the appeal of the genre (a Business Week article titled "Getting Dirty in Dutch Country" is particularly spectacular in its misunderstanding); "too many outside observers simply miss this point," she writes: "Amish novels turn not on the titillation of the carnal but on the thrill of the chaste." In part, the hypersexualization of contemporary culture (think Fifty Shades of Grey) accounts for the appeal of "clean" reads, as most Amish novels are, but hypermodernity is a factor too. In a world where people are tethered to their iPhones even after ten hours at the office, where everything is sleekly marketed and endlessly commodified and where people feel as lonely and disconnected as I did that cold winter in Germany, the appeal of a slower, simpler, community-focused life is obvious. In that sense, the real longing in the reading of Amish romances is not for a romantic coupling but for a life apart from the hypersexual and hypermodern.

Construing the Amish this way all but necessitates a degree of appropriation, which is by definition distorting. Amish values and practices may be appealing as they relate to traditional gender roles and motherhood; hard physical labor and education that ends at eighth grade are less worthy of nostalgia. Quilts, barn-raisings, and bread-baking, with all their appeal to multiple senses, feature prominently in the novels; Amish or quasi-Amish recipes sometimes show up in the back. But in the real world, fewer Amish are able to make a living at farming these days; most of their young folks are probably less chaste than the novels would suggest; and, significantly, Amish-themed novels generally don't engage one of the central commitments of the Amish: nonviolence. As Weaver-Zercher observes, the Amish commitment to nonviolence is downplayed in the novels so that "peace" becomes a private and internal matter, as in the notion of "inner peace." What the novels present is therefore not so much the Amish "as they are" but rather a non-Amish idealization of what readers—especially of the conservative evangelical persuasion—wish they were like.

For all this, Weaver-Zercher does not condemn the novels or their faithful readers. Though she is "personally ambivalent about the subgenre," she is "not ready to accuse all of its readers of unproductive nostalgia and fantasy filled escapism." She leaves us with the story of a nonagenarian man, Glenn, who'd farmed in Oklahoma all his life (even remaining through the Dust Bowl). In the last three years of his life, he read almost 90 Amish novels. Considering his story, she suggests that perhaps Glenn was not merely nostalgic; maybe such immersion in Amish fiction is better understood as "represent[ing] readers' desire for a sane, coherent, and communal future, a world in which the drought of hypermodernity has ended."

Once again, I'm living overseas, far from home, and we're just entering winter in the Southern Hemisphere. Will reading an Amish novel, surreptitiously, on my Kindle, make me feel at little warmer, a little closer to something that feels more like home? Improbably, contradictorily, problematically—perhaps it will.

Rachel Marie Stone is the author of Eat with Joy: Redeeming God's Gift of Food, published earlier this year by InterVarsity Press.

Most ReadMost Shared